May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, August 3rd, 2024 09:45 am
From Johann Baptis Krebs (aka J.B. Kerning)'s Betrachtungen über evangelische Wahrheiten [Meditations over Gospel Truths] (my translation):
 
Christ said, the kingdom of heaven is not outside, but within the heart1; but since the angels must also be in the kingdom of heaven, you cannot seek them anywhere else, but also in the heart. Just like the devil sticks in our flesh and blood, so are the angels in our soul, and struggle with the former for dominance. There are thus the good talents and drives in us which we must consider to be angels. Indeed Christ speaks also of many legions of angels which the father would send him if he desired. But here, even according to the doctrine of Christ, no incarnate angel can be meant, but rather spiritual powers which awake and stir through the word of the spirit would stand at his command. And the angels served him, the Gospels say, after he had vanquished Satan in three temptations. What sort of angel might those have been? Perhaps like servants with rich and noble lords who carry to him food after such tests, or would otherwise have been of assistance in something? To assume this argues entirely against Christianity, for since God is spirit, the angels can be nothing other than parts of God, thus also spirit, that is, spiritual potencies. There are indeed images and phenomena which the self-conscious are tempted to assume to be incarnate beings outside themselves, to be bodily objects, but which are with all the appearance of corporeality only visions, like those appearing to us in dreams. Such visions can with a calm life of the soul sometimes contain hints for us and our relatives, by nature they have no worth and no consequence; it is always the Holy Spirit and the word of God to which Christ directs his adherents, because only these two are contained in the being of the creator. For this reason we want to dispense with all miraculous activity, seek the word of Christ in the voice of the Holy Spirit, and thus approach the father in spirit and in truth.

1 Cf. Luke 17:21.

 
 

Contemplating the above, and Krebs' take on 'the house of my father has many rooms' and emphasis on God being within you, the thought came to me that Valhalla is within us. When we continue the fight to be our best we are working towards connecting with that Valhalla. If we give up the fight then we deny ourselves entry to the Valhalla within ourselves. The beauty of the Valhalla within us is that it is that place where we live for the fight to become our better selves. In this context you might be able to make a case for the Valkyrie being our astral bodies, perhaps.

Saturday, August 3rd, 2024 10:29 pm (UTC)
Obviously a topic I enjoy :) I have a lot of sympathy for the idea that Valhalla as "Viking heaven," a literal hall full of beer and pork and beautiful serving wenches, enjoyed only by those devoted to Odin who die gloriously in battle, is likely a distortion of some kind. In The One-Eyed God, Kris Kershaw argues that an afterlife for "warriors" must have originally meant the afterlife for all male ancestors, as they were all warriors in tribal times.

Likewise, despite my various disagreements with her (including a pantheism somewhat similar to Krebs's, but from another direction!), I like a lot of Maria Kvilhaug's thoughts here, which jive pretty well with what you're saying - visions of feasting and eternal partying are likely metaphors for achieving the kind of spiritual enlightenment that can be reached by an utter lack of fear of death and pursuit of greatness (shades of Julius Evola here - though she never mentions him, I think Kvilhaug must have at least read some of his stuff, or otherwise been familiar with his work).

Similarly with valkyries, there's definitely support for the idea that at least a special class of men each have a personal valkyrie, and this is sometimes conflated with the fylgja ("follower"), which is a quasi-autonomous part of the soul. There's also talk of everyone getting a personal norn (personified "fate" for lack of a better word), of varying qualities. Kvilhaug proposes that the valkyrie was the warrior sub-class of norns, and that makes a certain amount of sense to me. All of which is to say, I'm not sure exactly what the "valkyrie" (used here in the broader sense you mean) might be, whether firmly a part of our self, like the astral body, semi-autonomous like the fylgja, or fully separate, like a guardian genius, but the idea that each of us has a personalized source of spiritual guidance seems pretty firmly grounded in Heathen lore, but I'm still working out how to think about it.

As always, good food for thought here, thank you!
Jeff
Sunday, August 4th, 2024 12:49 am (UTC)
Ah, now that's an interesting connection I hadn't drawn! I've been meaning to dig more into Winifred Hodge Rose's Heathen Soul Lore for a while now, and one of the things I'm curious about is how it parallels and differs from the "standard" subtle body model JMG teaches. The idea of different parts of our self having their own being and agency is pretty different from what we are used to, though I suppose the Jungian model has some of that, and it's become pretty common to talk about "this part of myself wants X while this other part wants y" or "my subconscious feels one way, but my conscious self another" or the like, so maybe it's not so alien.
OSZAR »