Tuesday, May 27th, 2025 09:35 am
 

Blue sky day today, already 60℉ and barometer looks to be steady at 30 in/Hg.  Need to walk a little today.

 


 

There are a couple of out of date books that I really think need to be brought back to the thin gruel that is literary output these days.  

The Ugly American By Eugene Burdick and William J. Lederer

And

The Quiet American by Graham Greene

I think that these go back to an older time and place that really never went away, except for the fact that the bad guys in these novels won in the real-life mirror world that we inhabit.

I am going to think on my memories of these two books and after pondering for a bit, I might just write a piece on them and the way they dropped slowly out of the discussion as we began to believe that our imperial aspirations were actually coming true.

Monday, May 26th, 2025 11:51 pm

There are two classes in the US and possibly the world and only a single test is needed to determine which is which: there is the class of people who have had anxiety about affording groceries and the class that has never had to worry about affording groceries. In our current era of remoteness from anyone who grows a hundred percent of their own food, dependence upon the grocery store for daily sustenance is a given. On one side of the divide, we have those who have never skipped a meal for the reason they could not afford it. As much as certain people who used to fall into the Occupy Wall Street crowd want to think the upper crust is a tiny fraction of one percent who spoil outcomes for the remainder of the pyramid, the class of effortless grocery buyers that accidentally ruin everything are more like the upper twenty percent. This level is what I will call the salary class for the duration of this essay. The lower eighty percent is comprised of the lower middle class, the desperately poor, and everyone within that large spectrum. If you’ve never sweated the choice between a fast food meal and the last eighteen dollars in your bank account, it is likely you have never experienced being outside of the salary class.

Food, glorious food

Americans have a particularly warped relationship with food. Etheric starvation is especially pronounced here, hence our armies of diabetics, overweight, and obese citizens. Being dramatically overweight is a regular occurrence even among the wealthy in the US. The rich who are not overweight often go the opposite road of orthorexia, anorexia, and bulimia, enmeshing themselves in diet and exercise culture that hybridizes excessive pride in one’s physical appearance with obsessive lifestyle perfectionism.

I bore witness to an exhibit of this elite perfectionism once during a trip to Whole Foods. A mother and her young adult daughter were in front of me in the checkout line, both in a state of supermodel-esque near-emaciation. They were clothed in athletic gear that probably cost more than my monthly tax, title, and mortgage. They had a huge load of fresh produce on the conveyer belt. It took FOREVER for the cashier to scan all of their fruits and veggies, and to their credit, they were not at all impatient. The total of their groceries ended being over seven hundred dollars. The women expressed some wry amusement at the total, and the mother made a comment about the daughter being hungry.

Never in my life have I spent over three hundred dollars for groceries, and to add insult to injury, there is a supermarket down the street from Whole Foods that sells the very same brands of organic produce for a third of the cost. The two women did not have to care. They had plenty of money to burn.

The salary class

To be truly salary class, your wealth must come from sources outside of the work you do for money, if you deign to work at all. I grew up upper middle class and in my profound naivete, I did not realize that the key difference between my father and my friends’ fathers was that my salesman father earned his commission-based income in the direct, old fashioned way and my friends’ fathers provided mostly via inheritances and dividends. This is nothing new. Most of Jane Austen’s heroines end up marrying men whose “umpteen thousand a year” salaries come from investments. I have only recently come to realize this distinction on the soul level. If I had not been part of the lower classes after getting married, I don’t know that I would have truly understood the distinction.

The salary class kids are largely not OK. I have not seen many examples of salary class parents in my Generation X that have produced well-rounded, emotionally stable offspring. Severe drug addiction is par for the course as is severe depression. One boy I grew up with was obsessed with reliving being bullied in high school twenty years after the fact. His badly-managed trauma turned him into a depressive narcissist and a sex addict. A girl I grew up with name drops compulsively to this day — she has never figured out how to develop apparent self-worth. She is pathetic. Another girl has more substance addictions under her belt than Justin Bieber. Sadly two out of three of the aforementioned individuals has reproduced. These kids all had parents who gave them comfortable childhoods and a lack of financial limits that will last until their parents die and give them umpteen thousand a year from beyond the grave. It’s funny how little they’ve benefitted from never having to worry where grocery money is going to come from.

Meanwhile, back in the hood…

Most of my neighbors in the lower middle class neighborhood where I live are renters. Some of them are the non-conscientious poor, i.e. the “trash” of various races. White trash, black trash, Hispanic trash, etc. The trashiest of the trash depend on welfare, quietly deal drugs, and have lawns strewn with discarded furniture and bikes. Their loud fights are impossible not to overhear from their houses and yards. They are parasites and people like them are the primary reason the poor are so despised.

The backbone of the neighborhood (and thankfully the majority, at least for now) are the conscientious working poor. A single woman lives in a converted house apartment nearby. She has three jobs, one of which is Dollar Tree. Another is disabled and depends on her husband who works at Walmart. There is a family of Mexicans who immigrated a long time ago and raised their kids here: the whole family works. In rare cases where the conscientious working poor own property, they are typically quite house proud, pouring themselves and their strained resources into home improvement and maintenance.

To be the conscientious working poor is to feel you are always drowning. The second you believe you are getting ahead — not Lululemon and seven Ben Franklins at Whole Foods ahead but ahead in the sense you can afford you car payments for a couple of months — the System kicks you in the face and the undertow sucks you into the brine again. If you dare unclench, you are immediately threatened with losing your apartment and being forced to surrender your pets to the shelter. You are always oppressed by the specter of NOT ENOUGH MONEY, and on good days, you numb the consciousness of it by putting your nose to the grindstone and working harder or laughing it off. On bad days, it threatens to swallow you whole and crush you under its weight. It becomes much easier to hate Richie Rich and her clueless, designer-dressed entourage, but that kind of sepsis does not pay your bills so you do your best to shelve it. Besides, the trashy poor person you live next to is more of a direct threat, so any worrying time is usually spent on him. Being conscientious, working, and poor at the same time sucks ass and all of my conscientious working class neighbors know it intimately.

Cost of living is so bad that the average adult’s wage, side gigs and hustles included, equals about 1/17th of the buying power it had for a comparable young adult in 1973. I remember when a small bag of candy was ten cents and bread was under a dollar. A house that cost $150,000 was palatial and there were plenty of dumps comparable to the one my husband and I bought in 2016 that were $30,000 or less. No wonder so many adult children live with their parents: what other choice do they have? Often it is the parents who have nowhere to go. The 92 year old parent of a friend of mine is interred in a nursing home that costs $14,000 per month. Yes, what I just said probably deserves its own essay. I’ll give it some thought. At 14K per month, I have asked myself why the woman’s four children don’t just rent a house and a full-time, live in RN? Wouldn’t such an arrangement cost half the price or less? I guess nobody asked me.

Blame the rich


The rich women in Whole Foods and my salary class classmates are in many ways to blame for the current predicament of the lower eighty percent. When Richie Rich demolishes an already luxurious home or part of that home to build an executive mansion instead of making do in a more conservative, smaller house, it drives all property prices skyward and the taxes make it all but impossible for the conscientious working poor to buy the homes they deserve. When they buy seven hundred dollars worth of already-overpriced groceries, the stores raise their prices because they can. When they hire armies of questionably-documented workers to build, clean, and maintain their homes, the demand for that cheap labor makes it difficult for skilled laborers to compete. Every restaurant, warehouse, and store presents similar competition where poor illegal migrants compete for entry-level jobs. I tried explaining this to my salary class friend once and he did not get it. As Upton Sinclair said, it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on not understanding it.

I am not like the Occupy people. I do not want wealth redistribution. In fact, I eschew and rebuke all wealth that I did not earn. I will never own a single stock, not only because of my lackluster math skills, but because I have grown to hate and despise unearned wealth. To my mind, money made off of investments and stocks is unearned and that means it comes at the price of me having to earn it back in future lifetimes. Nope, DO NOT WANT. You’ll never know if I hit it big (with earned wealth, of course) because I will not live ostentatiously. I hate McMansions and I make no secret of this in my upcoming book, Sacred Homemaking. If unearned wealth somehow comes my way, I will do my damnedest to give it away as quickly as possible to a reputable charity. I think if more members of the salary class were like me, they would actually be better adjusted. There are more important and meaningful things than luxury and jet travel.

All in all, I am glad I was never salary class and I am grateful for my bohemian existence, even with its constant fear of financial drowning. Being thrown into this situation gave me insight into what most people are going through and enabled me to come down to Mama Earth rather than being another bored, depressed, confused, detached, perpetual tourist. I can do cool things I never would have learned how to do if I had been salary class: I can make all sorts of tasty meals from scratch, for instance, and the cost of groceries is closer to seven dollars instead of seven hundred. Little things make me happy and grateful in ways Richie Rich will never understand. Limits are powerful forces and financial limits can be taskmasters. As always, it is up to each one of us to make the best of what we are given, and in a perverse way, that can be easier when what you are given is a bit less.

Monday, May 26th, 2025 08:18 pm

I've been pretty down lately: most of this month I've been ill and very weak, and even after that, it's been stressful trying to catch back up with everything that fell by the wayside, and frustrating to strugglingly clear the fog from my mind and get back to being capable of thinking. I had a little space available to me, today, and I thought I might pluck Plotinos off the shelf... little did I know that this essay, which I struggled to make sense of two years ago, was just what I needed today.

Despite being a little lost last time, my summary actually wasn't too bad, but I still wanted to tinker with it, some:

I iv: On Well-Being [Revision of my original summary.]

Let us consider a musician and his lyre. It is the lyre that sings sweetly, but can it be considered to have well-being? No, it is the musician that can be well, and the lyre is a mere instrument of that well-being. But let us suppose that the lyre is out of tune or even broken: does this mean the musician is unwell? Well, maybe, but not necessarily: perhaps it was broken in his absence and he is not even aware of it, or perhaps he sings on even without an instrument, or perhaps he has grown tired of playing and now expresses himself through some other craft. But even in this last case, the musician does not disdain the lyre—it is simply not useful to him at the moment!

In the same way, a man's body is the mere instrument of the soul; and while the body might experience pleasure or contentment, this is merely akin to the lyre being in tune and in good repair. No, the Good is the highest of all, and so a man's good must come from his higher part: his well-being is of the soul, and being of the soul it is to be found solely within and not subject to the vagaries of without.

That most saintly man, who is consumed with divinity—what care has he of the body? He will be swayed neither by power and luxury, on the one hand, nor disease and disaster, on the other. Would we not call him a man of tremendous well-being, who could be satisfied even as he is placed on the pyre? But this is just what happens when the practice of the virtues is taken to its end.

In general, in my summaries of Plotinos, I have taken the tack of summarizing his conclusions and more-or-less ignoring his arguments. I think I was upset with my summary the first time since this was the first essay in which doing so was really glaring... it really leaves a lot out. But I think, by the end of summarizing the Enneads, I came to the conclusion that I can't really do justice to the full arguments; really, these summaries exist to A) remind me of the contents of the essays, and B) maybe, hopefully, entice others to read Plotinos—at least, those essays that seem most interesting to them. So if my summary seems abrupt and you want to know what the good man is like and why, then just read the real thing: it's linked above and it's not very long.

I didn't realize this the first time through Plotinos, but this essay is about εὐδαιμονία eudaimonia, the meaning of which was one of my Big Questions™ when I went through On the Gods and the World. The dictionary gives "prosperity, good fortune, wealth;" Murray and Nock translate this word as "happiness;" Taylor translates it "felicity;" MacKenna goes a little further and translates it "true happiness;" and Armstrong is critical of these and translates it as "well-being." I agree with Armstrong that any variation on "happiness" is misleading: the philosophers are not saying that the virtuous feel good, they are saying that they have transcended feeling. But it would be wrong to call such people "stoic" or "impassive," I think: Taoist and Zen masters are well known for their good humor, and angels (as the beings intrinsically possessing the virtues we try to take on) are full of joy. (Indeed, when I think of my own angel, I think of them first and foremost as playful.) Perhaps a very literal translation of eudaimonia might be "well-spirited," which I can sorta see as encompassing all of these notions.

In my summary I mention tossing the good man on a pyre, but Plotinos's actual example was of tossing him in the Bull of Phalaris. I wasn't familiar with it, but good old Diodoros tells us the story in the Library of History IX xviii–xix. Yipes!

Even though Plotinos is following Plato in his arguments, and even though Plato and Diogenes were at odds, it is hard not to see the stray dog as an exemplar of eudaimonia, retaining his well-being even as he was sold into slavery.

Monday, May 26th, 2025 09:35 am
 


Been gray here for a couple of days, temp is good around the mid sixties or so when the sky is gray, when the sun is out the temps have hit eighty.  Barometer is steady around 30.

 


 

Being a long time reader of sci-fi and fantasy, you start realizing that it is all stories about trying to do something that can’t really be done.  Granted, there is a spectrum to this, there are sci-fi/fantasy novels that are possible should the political will and drive occur (this is where a lot of “hard” SF resides).  The other end of the spectrum is pure fantasy.  Where things that just can’t be are put into play and the characters are reacting to an unknown in a human way. 

Since I am trying to write something a step beyond fanfic (a subject I have to discuss sometime in light of my failed attempt) I need to stake out where my world lies on the spectrum described above.

Books have been written that deal with things (more sci-fi) I am trying to wrestle with.  So lately I have been reading up on asteroids and nuclear pulse propulsion.  In doing so, I have been using the digital card catalog that is currently being fobbed off as “artificial intelligence”.  Overall, I am pretty pleased with the results.

It seems that as long as I ask focused questions, the answers that I get are pretty focused as well.  The answers thus far come with pretty extensive lists of articles to support the answers.  

So, just to give you a hint, the reading list that I think will give an inkling of the “technical” direction my story will take is:

Footfall by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.

Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson

Anathem by Neal Stephenson

Universe by Robert Heinlein

The Sparrow by Maria Doria Russell

I am inconveniencing some ones and zeros over at a different site at Dreamwidth where I will post answers that I get from Grok and/or Gemini concerning specific technical/scientific questions.


Sunday, May 25th, 2025 10:04 pm
Astrology of NationsMidnight is upon us and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note:  Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will just be deleted.  If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here

Also:
 I will not be putting through or answering any more questions about practicing magic around children. I've answered those in simple declarative sentences in the FAQ. If you read the FAQ and don't think your question has been answered, read it again. If that doesn't help, consider remedial reading classes; yes, it really is as simple and straightforward as the FAQ says.  And further:  I've decided that questions about getting goodies from spirits are also permanently off topic here. The point of occultism is to develop your own capacities, not to try to bully or wheedle other beings into doing things for you. I've discussed this in a post on my blog.

The
 image? I field a lot of questions about my books these days, so I've decided to do little capsule summaries of them here, one per week.  This is my seventy-ninth published book, and those readers who have been following this journal for more than a few years already know a fair amount about it. It's a practical manual of political and economic astrology or, to use the traditional term, mundane astrology. Its intention is to teach people how to cast and interpret charts to predict the future of any country they desire. It's only been out for a little while, but initial feedback suggests that it does the job tolerably well. Interested? You can get a copy here if you're in the United States and via your favorite online or brick-and-mortar bookshop elsewhere. 

(I'm almost out of books to summarize here -- I have one more book that's been published since this came out, and two more that might be out in time. I have some amusing ideas about what else to do once I've finished the whole sequence -- but all in good time.)

Buy Me A Coffee

Ko-Fi

I've had several people ask about tipping me for answers here, and though I certainly don't require that I won't turn it down. You can use either of the links above to access my online tip jar; Buymeacoffee is good for small tips, Ko-Fi is better for larger ones. (I used to use PayPal but they developed an allergy to free speech, so I've developed an allergy to them.) If you're interested in political and economic astrology, or simply prefer to use a subscription service to support your favorite authors, you can find my Patreon page here and my SubscribeStar page here
 
Bookshop logoI've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.

And don't forget to look up your Pangalactic New Age Soul Signature at CosmicOom.com.

With that said, have at it! 

***This Magic Monday is now closed, and no further comments will be put through. See you again when I return from hiatus in mid-June!***
Saturday, May 24th, 2025 08:13 am
 

Yesterdays walk

 


 

I am a fan of our most JMG’s fiction writing.  I was informed recently by an informed source that his latest foray is NOT young adult fiction as the protagonist is eighteen at the start  (I am leery of this, having raised two sons and comparing that age with the actions/mental attitude of what is categorized as “young adult).  So I might just take a stab at reading about Ms. Maravec’s adventures.

That being said, I want to discuss his representation of a delicacy that I still rely on in my dotage.  The name of my recipe is “pimped out ramen” though JMG may well have a more culturally appropriate name for it.  For some reason, I thought that I had bought a kindle copy of his “Weird of Hali Cookbook” but it isn’t in my library.  The cost of getting old I guess.

JMG wrote of this delicacy in a moderately disparaging manner in “WOH-Innsmouth and WOH-Providence.  I was somewhat irritated by the dismissive tone of his description, but being a bigger person than that, I put it behind me and very much enjoyed the series.

I ran across this today in my reading:  https://x.com/RabidLagomorph/status/1924725776865485013

Now, I agree with a lot of the sentiments here, but there is more to it.  

Ramen is a staple food.  The ½ price brand that he is mocking is one of those “elite” brands that yuppies buy to make themselves think that they better than other folks.  The birds eye frozens are always overpriced, and the price of spam is relatively expensive.

But the theory is sound for the actual meal, the execution presented is more a function of a sleazeball corporation marketing a phony narrative to relieve themselves of stock that isn’t moving.

Pimped Out Ramen

Ingredients

↦ Two (2) packages of cheap ramen noodles (about $0.37 each)

↦ Tablespoon of peanut oil (guess=$0.05)

↦ 1-½ teaspoons of onion powder

↦ 1 teaspoon garlic powder

↦ ½ teaspoon of red pepper flakes

↦ Tablespoon of peanut butter (I am guessing around $0.15??)

↦ 2 tablespoons Soy Sauce (for god's sake do not buy la choy!!!)

↦ 1-½ cups of frozen vegetable (I like the traditional provided they have baby lima beans)

↦ 1 egg

↦ 2 ounces mystery meat (1 jumbo hot dog or ¼ can of spam) (≅$0.25 for the hot dog or $1.00 for the fancy spam, I suppose you could use other meats that are “healthier” and probably cheaper, but in the day, spam was cheap…..now it isn’t.

Directions

First, boil enough water to cook the noodles, when it comes to a boil, cook the noodles (reserve the flavor packets),  and drain. Reserve until after the next step.

Fry the egg in the oil, add all the spices and peanut butter while it is hot, and saute for a minute or two, dump in the frozen vegetables and the chopped up mystery meat and saute until the vegetables get unfrozen.  I am personally ambivalent about dumping in the flavor packets for the last stir.  Sometimes artificial ingredients are damn tasty and they haven’t killed me yet.

When all this is ready to your liking, dump in the drained noodles and mix everything until it looks the way you want, dump it into the bowl, and go eat it on the kitchen table while reading.

Just remember, this is a meal for one.  Serve this at dinner and prepare to be looked at funny. 






Saturday, May 24th, 2025 08:09 am

Archimedes, the Sicilian, asked for a fulcrum situated outside of the earth to move the earth, saying: “Whilst I inhabit it I cannot act upon it.”

(Synesios on Dreams IV, as translated by Isaac Myer.)


Arithmetical truth cannot be defined in arithmetic.

(Informal statement of Tarski's Undefinability Theorem.)


From any given system, one hasn't the perspective to make sense of that system. For that, one needs a perspective outside the system.

This has two implications. First, it makes sense of why the infinite becomes finite in an attempt to know itself: there is nothing outside of God, and so an outside perspective must be constructed, so that part of God may come to know God in part. Second, it perhaps explains why we strive ever higher: if we have questions about the system, it is only by ascending to the next higher system that we can answer those questions, causing us to rise until we return to God.

Friday, May 23rd, 2025 11:57 pm

I am happy to read your Ogham free of charge -- that's how I hone my divination skills.  Please limit your reading request to four or fewer Ogham cards: though this can take many forms, here are some common ones (all of them are basically combos of 4 cards):
 
-a single three card reading for the week or month and a one-off, one card reading
-four questions about four separate items that require one answer (card) per item
-a one card reading to answer a specific question and a three card for a more nuanced question
-Two separate readings, two cards a piece exploring the positives and negatives of two different choices
 
I am happy to do Ogham readings confidentially via email -- just email me at k steele studio at gmail during the allotted time/before deadline.  I cannot answer health questions.  If you have a question about health or another sensitive, private matter, provide a bunch of non-identifying information and the Ogham will be able to figure it out even if I don't. I'm serious... the Ogham actually tend to "know" things without me being privy to what is going on.

Please note I take time off during Solstices and Equinoxes for Druid stuff and because sometimes I simply need a break

My next planned break is from Saturday, June 21, 2025 - Friday, July 11, 2025.

I take reading requests from whenever this post goes up on Friday night until 8pm US Central Time Saturday.  

For a more in depth look into how I read and interpret the Ogham's symbols, please visit my website druidogham.wordpress.com.

I am currently trying to minimize my use of PayPal.  If you'd like to make a donation, I would be grateful if you did it here:

http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele

Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.

Tags:
Friday, May 23rd, 2025 12:22 pm
domeWelcome back to Frugal Friday! This is a weekly forum post to encourage people to share tips on saving money, especially but not only by doing stuff yourself. A new post will be going up every Friday, and will remain active until the next one goes up. Contributions will be moderated, of course, and I have some simple rules to offer, which may change further as we proceed.

Rule #1:  this is a place for polite, friendly conversations about how to save money in difficult times. It's not a place to post news, views, rants, or emotional outbursts about the reasons why the times are difficult and saving money is necessary. Nor is it a place to use a money saving tip to smuggle in news, views, etc.  I have a delete button and I'm not afraid to use it.

Rule #2:  this is not a place for you to sell goods or services, period. Here again, I have a delete button and I'm not afraid to use it.

Rule #3:  please give your tip a heading that explains briefly what it's about.  Homemade Chicken Soup, Garden Containers, Cheap Attic Insulation, and Vinegar Cleans Windows are good examples of headings. That way people can find the things that are relevant for them. If you don't put a heading on your tip it will be deleted.

Rule #4: don't post anything that would amount to advocating criminal activity. Any such suggestions will not be put through.

With that said, have at it!  
Friday, May 23rd, 2025 09:19 am
 

A fence in Kingston

 


 

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master——that’s all.”

Lewis Carroll’s “Through the Looking Glass”

 


 

There is an imagined certainty when discussing anything of merit.  That language itself is so poorly suited to accurately expressing the things that the inside of our heads refer to laughingly as “reality” is to make most discussions an exercise in futility. 

The italicized statement above keeps coming into my head.  I also read a quick article today over at Slashdot which discusses how a simple change in how a single letter in code (ascii versus unicode) which describes the same letter in a cryptic line of programming code can muck things up .  It is amazing how two different renditions of a word/symbol  (if one can count the cryptic “githubusercontent” as such) can blow up at the code level.

The same kind of thing happens here on the internet when the sincerely concerned attempt to supercharge the transmission of an individual’s night sweats to another.  After all, what good is a fear of something that you have no effect upon unless you can share your internal terror and transmit that fear.


“Most ‘scientists’ are bottle washers and button sorters.”

— Robert A. Heinlein


So here in the land of the internet, people spend much time and effort trolling for scraps and clues for their fears to support their night sweats.  There is a lot of high quality “panic ore” out there.  Mostly the information is partially distilled, with information pulled out of larger datasets and presented as universal when, in fact, it presents a conclusion that the entire study cannot support.

I am not saying that there aren’t serious problems raging around.  There are some that can be addressed, there are some that are out of our control and we will simply have to adapt to.  But unless folks sit down and look at the entire (nearly overwhelming?) sets of overlapping data, there can be nothing useful done.

So, before you start bandying about the “snarl words” like extinction and collapse and fascist and nazi, please remember these words are just there to stop your thinking.  The more unpalatable thoughts that these words mask are things like change and adaptation and what we have to do on a societal and individual basis to make our way through the maze of not especially palatable realities that these words disguise.

Thursday, May 22nd, 2025 11:56 am
 

Ugly, but I like it

 


 

One of the reasons that I have been noodling around with the inappropriately named AI “Grok” is that it sure makes getting the current consensus about things in the realm of science much, much easier.  I am not saying, by any means, that what it is giving me is “true”, but it does a pretty fair job of putting together a decent idea of what constitutes the current most-favored-hypothesis.

I feel even more relaxed because I am not going to use the information to give you tiresome lectures concerning the state of the world or the ethics of people that I don’t know.  I am using it to construct a world which I can populate with stories that are, at best, embryonic inside my cranium.

So I am piggybacking on all the pictures and data coming back from the rovers and orbiters beavering away around Mars.  What brought this on was a reread of Edgar Rice Burroughs “John Carter of Mars” books.  Now there are folks out there who will sneer at the “outdated” view of Mars, but all that does for me is make my eyes hurt from rolling them, we are talking about made up worlds here folks and when E.R. Burroughs was doing his scribbling in 1917, the scientists were thinking of Mars as a dying world with canals.

So I am spending my time reading up and thinking about things that will have no real effect on my life.  It is pleasant.  Martian ensolation, surface ionizing radiation, martian axial tilts, magnetic fields and other such foofooraw are being merged into a world that doesn’t quite exist.  Even worse, I am setting the time about 13,000 years ago, so the world is long gone.  

I suppose that this time I decided to spend a little time creating my own non-existent world rather than copying someone else’s answers.  I am now trying to redeem myself by going through the bother of world creation.

I am thinking that I will have a basic idea of my fantasy version of Mars 13,000 years ago in the next couple of weeks, it won’t be complete, but it will be a beginning that I can work from.

Now I get to populate it with Gods and people.  I have some very preliminary ideas here, but I am going to wait until I get the world built before I fly them there.

Thursday, May 22nd, 2025 01:22 pm
Glastonbury TorAs I think most of my readers are aware by now, I'll be in England for the first week or so of June -- in London from Monday the 2nd to Thursday the 5th, and then traveling to Glastonbury from then until Monday the 9th. I have a couple of details to pass on, a few remaining scraps of scheduling to work out, and also a couple of not-quite-unrelated announcements. 

I will be doing two booksignings while in London. The first is at Watkins Bookshop on Tuesday, June 3 at 5 pm, where I'll be releasing my new book The Way of the Secret Temple, the third instructional volume in the Golden Section Fellowship sequence, covering the advanced methods of the Fellowship's system of self-initiation. Details on the booksigning can be found here

book 3The second is the next evening at Atlantis Books, where I'll be launching a second new book -- Revisioning the Tree of Life. This is the first-ever booklength exploration of the Cabala I learned from my teacher John Gilbert. It's a complete manual of Cabalistic meditation, pathworking, and magic, with techniques that as far as I know have never been published anywhere. Details on the booksigning can be found here

cabalaSo it's going to be a lively time. In the meantime, I've made sure to have plenty of room in my schedule for readers and students of my books who happen to be in London on the 2nd and 3rd; from the time I arrive at Heathrow at 7 in the morning on the 2nd until the afternoon of the 3rd, I'm pretty much footloose and fancy free. Let me know if you'd like to get together during any of that window of time. I'll also have some free time in Glastonbury, but that's going to be much more of a catch-as-catch-can matter. (On the other hand, if anyone's driving back from Glastonbury to or past London on Monday the 9th, and has a spare seat, please let me know.) 

Finally, let's talk a little about those books. The Way of the Secret Temple is available for preorder now, and will be actually in print by the time I reach England, in paperback and hardback editions -- if you intend to do the work, I recommend the hardback, since you'll be putting a year of hard use into your copy. You can order a copy here

wheel, dammitRevisioning the Tree of Life is also available for preorder, with a bonus -- use the code RTL20 when you order and it's 20% off. It won't actually be out until September but orders are being taken now. You can place an order for your copy here

Finally, I'm delighted to report that my book on the Merlin legend as the foundation for a set of mystery initiations, which was dropped by its original publisher, will be back in print under the title I wanted -- Merlin's Wheel -- and in a greatly revised and expanded edition, which includes full instructions for practicing it using the ritual methods of the Golden Section Fellowship and the Fellowship of the Hermetic Rose as well as those of the Druidical Order of the Golden Dawn. I'm very pleased by this new edition and I think you will be too. It'll be out in October, but it's also available for preorder now, and if you use the code MW20 when you order it's also 20% off. You can place an order for your copy here

So there you have it. This spring has shaped up to be a very busy and successful time for me and I hope it's the same for you and yours. I'll look forward to seeing some of you in England in a few weeks! 
Wednesday, May 21st, 2025 09:46 am

Happy Hermes-Day! Can we talk about Teiresias for a second? That whole thing with the snakes [item 3] has been bothering me.

So if you're recall, one day blind Teiresias was walking on Mount Kullene (the birthplace of Hermes), stumbled across two snakes entwined in sex, and he accidentally crushes one or both of them with his staff. Hera was infuriated at this and changed Teiresias into a woman. Teiresias becomes a priestess of Hera. At some point, Apollo advises Teiresias that if he ever happens upon the same situation to crush one or the other of the snakes with his staff; in the eighth year of being a woman, Teiresias does and is restored to his original form.

This is clearly a story about reincarnation in order to learn a particular lesson: Teiresias is each of us, Teiresias's sex-change is reincarnating into different bodies, Hera is "mother Earth" and becoming her priestess is to devote oneself to learning her lessons; Apollo is the mysteries and his advice is the mystery teachings; eight years is a "great year" representing one's greater life (Apollodoros, Library III iv §2).

All that is very straightforward, I think; the only question is, what is the lesson to be learned? It has something to do with polarity, certainly, which already puts me at a disadvantage since I'm of a monistic bent and have a difficult time making sense of dualities; but it is further complicated by the fact that almost every version of the story we possess tells it differently. I tend to trust Apollodoros more than the others, but his version is itself ambiguous, so we're on our own.

Thinking about this, though, reminded me of the Ra Material; if you're not familiar with it, it's one of the major channeled texts of the New Age movement. (Since it's a channeled text, we're already in super-grain-of-salt-territory, but bear with me.) "Ra" states that there are seven degrees of consciousness, and that each degree of consciousness has a lesson to learn in order for beings of that consciousness to move to the next degree of consciousness. First degree beings (like minerals) are static and inanimate, and their lesson is to learn to move and grow. Second degree beings (like plants and animals) are animate but unselfconscious, and their lesson is to learn individuality. We humans are third degree beings, and our lesson is to learn to relate the individual to the all. "Ra" says that there are two polarities of relating to the all: the positive pole of giving to others or compassion, and the negative pole of taking from others or selfishness; since all is one, both the love of others and the love of self are ways of loving the all, and so either way can carry one upwards, but the crucial point is to develop enough reflective capacity and will to be capable of actively choosing a path.

Of course, all models are wrong, but some are useful: true or not, "Ra's" model certainly has the merit of making sense of the snakes. The female snake is the negative pole (and let me stress that I'm not denouncing women, I am referring strictly to the inward-attracting direction of any negative pole); the male snake is the positive pole (as outward-emitting); Teiresias is doomed to reincarnation by being incapable of choosing a path (his first killing is accidental); over a great year he studies the lessons of earth, guided by the mysteries; finally, he is freed from reincarnation by choosing a path (his second killing is willed). Perhaps it even makes sense of why so many variants of the story are recorded: a "pure" version of the story, like the "Ra" material, stresses the free will of the individual to choose as they please; however, "moralistic" versions of the story might urge the individual to prefer one or the other polarity. (And I can certainly sympathize with this: I would, myself, much rather hasten to the light in love than sound the darkness in isolation.)

Penises (as emblematic of male sexuality) are really all over the mysteries, from the phalluses in the temples of Osiris to the thursoi of Dionusos. (Hell, if you haven't read De Dea Syria, there's a veritable boatload of penises in there for you.) I've always thought that's pretty weird to say the least, but if it's an injunction towards the positive pole, that would at least make some sense of it.

It is interesting to me that Hermes picked up the image of the story as his symbol, carrying always the kerukeion with it's two snakes coiling around Teiresias's cornel-wood staff, topped by the wings which the development of will grants. It is interesting that this became Hermes's symbol even though Athena also figures prominently in the Teiresias myth; we see just the opposite in the Perseus myth, where Perseus is guided by both gods, but only Athena took her symbol—the head of Medousa affixed to a shield—from there.

Wednesday, May 21st, 2025 08:41 am
 


The picture above is the current state of my cider.  I figure to give it another couple of days before I bottle it.

When you look at the goop on the bottom, that is a mixture of blackberry crud and yeast poop (and dormant yeast spores) that remain after the good juices have been used up.

I am thinking of going to pick up a three more cartons of apple juice.  ( from a commercial restaurant store and each carton yields a gallon of juice)

What I am thinking is that after I bottle the cider, I will add the three (3) cartons of juice to the crud (formally referred to by the cognoscenti as "lees") top the fermentor with water and use the yeast that is there to ferment the juice added.

Might be an abject failure, but might yield a cider with a little more color and just smidge of blackberry flavor.  

Just thinking

Tuesday, May 20th, 2025 12:24 pm
distrust the scienceWe are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 
Tuesday, May 20th, 2025 12:30 am
My husband recently bought our cats a tiny stuffed plush unicorn with rainbow ribbons for its hair and a sparkly, fuchsia horn. When I was obsessed with unicorns at age eight in the 1980s, unicorn toys were actually fairly hard to find. There were all of two or three at Toys ‘R Us and my indulgent parents bought me at least two of them. One was a hand puppet. None of them had rainbows, though I would have loved it if they did. Unicorns certainly were not ubiquitous enough to be found in the form of a cat toy and they were not flamboyantly gay.

If there is a year that anyone can pinpoint where gay truly became mainstream, I would place it around 2010, five years before gay marriage was legalized in the US. Politics is always downstream of culture. In my corner of the Midwest, being gay was already no big deal. Around the time when I graduated college in 1994, a young gay man made an attempt to shame me for using the term BFE. (I used saltier language back then!) The term means butt-f***ing Egypt and refers to terrifying backwaters where rubes torment newcomers with brutal, sodomite initiation rites. It’s a funny term and always has been. The young man had no sense of humor — he was Woke decades before it was cool — and he immediately put me in my place. I was younger then and I deferred. The current me would probably not be as kind, and would be quick to point out that anal sex is not the exclusive domain of gay men. As an aside, every straight woman I knew as a young person experimented with butt stuff long before her gay male contemporaries.

Gay used to have a specialness and a glamour about it that made it scintillating and fun. Gay used to mean homosexual and was not an umbrella term for deviants, perverts, autistic sociopaths, and open air pedophiles. Transsexuals were not lumped into the gay spectrum because many gays had no gender confusion whatsoever: some feminine women chose other feminine women, and they were called femmes. Masculine men who preferred other masculine men were not pressured to flip sexes in order to fall into straight stereotypes. There were also boyish girls and girlish boys who had no desire to castrate themselves or obtain mastectomies and hysterectomies. Gay may have been closeted and underground, but it was free of sanctimony. When LGBTQIA+ inclusion coopted gayness, it took with it the joie de vivre that made gay interesting and… well… gay.

The frenetic desire to belong to a tribe is completely understandable. When I first went vegan, I was desperate to find other vegans. Once I did find other vegans, I quickly realized that I wanted to get as far away from other vegans as possible. Just because people share a similar interest does not mean a group of them has any business getting together. I may like horror movies, but that does not mean I will have anything in common with others who enjoy them. I was pretty much born enjoying horror movies. I have loved them since I understood the difference between film and TV and real life. My predisposition does not make me in any way unique.

The drama/attention trap

Theater kids truly do ruin everything. The most dramatic gays are the theater kids who camp it up from an early age. The gay theater kid will often spend the rest of his life confusing reality with the stage, and that means he is a creature of emotional turmoil in every moment except perhaps young childhood. When he is bullied for his gayness at age thirteen, he will spend the rest of his life marinating in the victimhood of that era. Never mind that straight kids are bullied with great frequency too and that girls are turned into victims of sexual harassment or plain old sexual assault more often than boys. The current LGBTQIA+ movement was spawned by the theater gays of the eighties and nineties who were stupid enough to think communism and forcing their cartoonish ideas of gayness down the throats of straights and everyone else would terminate in a Skittles rainbow utopia of free love and hot sex. Instead, they have managed to wear on the general public like a sticky, highly-elasticized tank top on a sweltering summer day. They are annoying and make us long for cooler weather. The theater gays got busy in the wake of gay marriage, paving the way for the erasure of gay women as TERFs and of gay kids as would be straights in the form of trans sex-swapping. The movement has gone far enough now that a swing in the opposite direction is underway. Expect an equally retarded return to “traditional” values soon, with all the crappy caveats for both sexes.

What ever happened to live and let live?

My earliest memories in the defense of gays was the notion of leaving well enough alone. If only the nosiest among us stopped being so morbidly preoccupied with the bedroom antics of Sara and Lisa or Steve and Dan, the world would be much better, I rationalized. Gays were the creative backbone of civilization and unfairly persecuted at that. If only we had a more enlightened society where being gay did not mean prison time and shock treatments, that would be great. Christians seemed especially threatened by gayness, and of course the most vitriolic anti-gay preachers were secretly gay themselves. Jim Bakker was rumored to have numerous same-sex romps. Numerous gay scandals swirl around televangelist preacher Ted Haggard to this day. And let’s not leave out the Catholic church, which is infamous for its gay subculture from the Vatican on down as well as its pedophile protection rackets. The worst behavior among gays used to be associated with Christian hypocrisy until the mid-2010s when drag queens and transsexuals rose from the depths to claim the title.

Desmond Napoles is to the LGBTQIA+ movement what Greta Thunberg is to Davos climate activism. Both have acted as human shields to deflect the wrath of regular people towards a sinister crew of demonic swamp monsters who sit conveniently in the shadows and pull their puppet strings. Greta, now 22, is a laughingstock and a meme. She is a good example of what happens when high-functioning autism goes horribly wrong. Desmond, once known as Desmond is Amazing, is only 18 at the time of this writing. He is sadly on a similar trajectory as Thunberg, doubling down on what made him famous as a young person in hopes of recapturing public attention. Neither of these two know it is over. Thunberg is still yelling at random people and Desmond is still caking on neon makeup and insisting on being referred to as “them”. At least now Desmond is at an age where the advances made upon him by perverted old gay men are no longer straight up pedophilia. At least now there is some sense of him being able to give consent. Seven years ago, however, he was certainly groomed and put in harm’s way by his mother, who ought to be ashamed. He was pimped out from age eight. Who knows when the real abuse began? Infancy? Soon he will also be a meme, put to pasture by an increasingly hostile wave of anti-grooming conservatives.

Had Desmond (is Amazing) Napoles been a one-off incident of a child being thrown under the bus, there would be no backlash. Instead, Desmond’s grooming was symptomatic of a trend that is still trying to take over the world and announcing its intention at every turn.

During the worst possible time — Covid lockdowns — gay theater kids took it upon themselves to announce they were taking the world by storm, via un-ironic fascism a.k.a. being in lockstep alignment with large corporations. Disney’s boardroom was awash with patently obvious gay luxury communist programming agendas. Genderqueer, a nasty, soft porn graphic novel that depicted fellatio among the underaged, was forced into public school libraries while the entire subject of math was being questioned for its racism. TikTok was rife with purple haired elementary schoolteachers going into excruciating detail about their kinks, and they weren’t fired until a decent amount of outrage was stirred by Libs of TikTok, which of course was promptly doxxed. Trans, the idea that a child who is not able to legally drive a car or buy alcohol or cigarettes is able to make lifelong decisions about future fertility and medical dependency, swept the land in waves, drowning many who will never recover from the barbaric amputation of their private parts and permanent chemical sterilization and its attendant side effects.

This, plus the insistence that gay was whatever they felt at the time and that a black woman should and would be able to identify as a genderfluid ostrich, stole the joy and light of gayness. Gone was the acid wit of Oscar Wilde. Its gold was replaced with leaden accusations of pronoun crimes and men cutting off their junk in order to present as perpetually depressed, although pretty women. Drag shows went from impromptu bawdy, underground laughter sessions in dive bars to Story Hours where sick freaks paraded their obvious fetishes for toddler rape.

The mainstreaming of the gay movement and its transformation into LGBTIA+ alphabet soup heralded its erasure and downfall. Gays did this to themselves; don’t feel sorry for them. Gays really were persecuted once upon a time. The 1980s, though far more friendly to gays than the 70s or any era before that, were still marked by vicious crimes against gay people and a general disdain for gayness. When we called someone “gay” back then, it was half joke and half slur. Nowadays it just seems quaint. Gays and the various others who lump themselves into LGBTQIA, however, still operate as if any deviation from the heterosexual norm is still grounds for teasing and bullying if not torture and murder as it was back in the 1980s. Drama queens will always need to see themselves as an oppressed class. This also goes hand in hand with liberalism. They want to be a persecuted class because this helps them avoid thinking about all of their own culpability in macro and micro aggressions against their own victims. Playing the victim means you cannot be the oppressor, or at least it means you have an excuse for being an oppressive bastard.

Gay is neither transgressive, progressive, nor titillating

Nobody cares if you’re gay. Seriously, nobody cares. Mixed race couples used to be scandalous too. Being gay is about as scandalous as having a mixed race relationship. In 1960, mixed race relationships raised eyebrows. Nowadays, they do not. Trotting out gayness, gender fluidity, or whatever is supposedly against normal is actually the new normal. Everyone is a little gay, just as there are mixed race kids running around in every neighborhood, whether it is the slums or McMansion Row. When various pop stars drop hints that they’ve kissed a girl or wear full bondage regalia at their concerts, it’s Dullsville. Show me something I haven’t seen in a while. Show me actual talent. Gay does not shock and it does not appall. I didn’t care what gays did in their private homes then and I don’t care now. Blue and pink hair is not flamboyant when every other person has it. Phallic sex toys are not salacious when old ladies writing books about tidying and organizing mention having a dildo collection. Even Diddy’s hatred of women and his thirty odd year run of sexual blackmail of other males is not shocking. It is as if we knew it all along.

We don’t care if you are confused about your gender. David Bowie and every other glam rocker wore more makeup in a month than most women wear in their entire lives. They wore higher heels too. Though it was fun to watch, drag wasn’t a topic of deep conversation that required loud declarations of identity. It should go back to that.

We don’t care if you were born asexual. Some people never get horny for anyone else, and some people find they never get horny enough to make it worth pairing off with a mate. In the old days, you had the option of becoming a vestal virgin, a priest, or a nun. Nowadays, becoming a priest or a nun seems to be nearly synonymous with truly subversive, demonic crap, so try at your own risk.

We don’t want to hear about your sexual needs and desires. As for losing desire, lesbian bed death is no different than the heterosexual kind. Being monogamous isn’t always exciting, it’s just that heteros in long term relationships don’t feel the need to blab about our sex lives (or lack thereof) to everyone all the time. Perhaps we don’t need as much external validation.

The average straight person has no problem with anything gay unless you make it her problem. Sadly, the last ten to fifteen years have been all about making gay into a cause for consternation instead of cause for celebration.

Thanks for reading!  This article is also available with pictures at Substack.
Tags:
Monday, May 19th, 2025 07:07 pm
The Father remains beyond, elusive, enthroned eternally within the deep recesses of the cloud covering the mountaintops, the divine darkness, essentially unknowable, his secret counsels forever shrouded.

He can only be sought by way of the Son, the incarnate, the proximate, the flesh-and-blood reality we recognize in our everyday lives. He is the Word of the Father, God made audible, whereby all things are brought from the mind of God into realization, conveying the message of Heaven to Earth, bridge across the unfathomable gulf between mortals and the Absolute. He is, too, Christ, the redeemer, insofar as everywhere there is an intimation of the Divine he offers the promise of salvation to those estranged from their Source, in various guises prompting recollection of our heavenly home, every sibyl a signpost on the Way. Thus, the Son reveals the Father.

As both these two are equally Divine and of one substance, their holy breath pours forth from the Father and the Son, one imperishable Spirit that is in all things, giving life and drawing all up into the cosmic mystery.
Monday, May 19th, 2025 09:59 am
 

Fall Colors (Yes, I know that it is spring)

 


 

Taking up my conversation from Saturday, again, I am going to be be discussing the idea of artificial intelligence and its limitations.  Here is the punchline that I will be using as a springboard to this continuation:

Overall, what grok gave me was approximately equivalent to what I would expect from an average freshman at a small state college.  

Now, for those of you who have had the experience of grading such things (for me, three quarters of being a TA back in the eighties and one quarter of covering for a sick professor at the local community college in the early 2000’s) you need to know that this is at best, an awkward and singularly unrewarding experience.

First problem is the use of the language and words.  Freshman really haven’t spent that much time writing and when faced with a 1,000 word essay, they see it as comparable to an assault on the south face of K2. The results tend to confirm the abilities of the individuals in the class and, as a slap to the new-generation educators out there, the results also conform with the ancient apostasy of “grading on the curve”.

In the dark past of my undergraduate days, the majority of professors graded on the curve (5%=F, 10%=D, 50%=C, 10%=B, and 5%=A) though there was differences in the ratios, with changes in curve shape to allow for more people to pass as time went on.

From my limited experience, the results being presented by Grok seem to parallel the easy curves.  The easier the question, the more the curve becomes right handed with more good results.  The harder the question (more controversial), the further the quality of the answer skews toward the left side (with higher quality being on the right). 

Most of the complaints about AI is asking it to come up with a decent web search for a difficult question and then write the answer in a manner that agrees with the questioners preconceptions.  People love AI when it spews back an answer that agrees with the way that they already think.  Kinda like grading undergraduate papers, anyone doing this unpleasant task gives good grades to the students that parrot back the instructors beliefs.

Sunday, May 18th, 2025 09:44 pm
Jerry Shimizu carries a gun. Midnight is upon us and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note:  Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will just be deleted.  If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here

Also:
 I will not be putting through or answering any more questions about practicing magic around children. I've answered those in simple declarative sentences in the FAQ. If you read the FAQ and don't think your question has been answered, read it again. If that doesn't help, consider remedial reading classes; yes, it really is as simple and straightforward as the FAQ says.  And further:  I've decided that questions about getting goodies from spirits are also permanently off topic here. The point of occultism is to develop your own capacities, not to try to bully or wheedle other beings into doing things for you. I've discussed this in a post on my blog.

The
 image? I field a lot of questions about my books these days, so I've decided to do little capsule summaries of them here, one per week.  This is my seventy-eighth published book and nineteenth novel, a stand-alone (so far) tale set in 2095 or so. You could call it cli-fi (the current cute label for climate change fiction) if you like, or deindustrial SF; I'd call it a deindustrial noir Shinto science fiction spy thriller with Gnostic overtones. Jerry Shimizu, the two-fisted, gun-toting, half-Japanese tough guy who narrates the story, and the world in which he lives are interesting enough, at least to me, that he may get a sequel...but we'll see.  If you're interested, you can get copies here in the US and here elsewhere. 

Buy Me A Coffee

Ko-Fi

I've had several people ask about tipping me for answers here, and though I certainly don't require that I won't turn it down. You can use either of the links above to access my online tip jar; Buymeacoffee is good for small tips, Ko-Fi is better for larger ones. (I used to use PayPal but they developed an allergy to free speech, so I've developed an allergy to them.) If you're interested in political and economic astrology, or simply prefer to use a subscription service to support your favorite authors, you can find my Patreon page here and my SubscribeStar page here
 
Bookshop logoI've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.

And don't forget to look up your Pangalactic New Age Soul Signature at CosmicOom.com.

With that said, have at it! 

***This Magic Monday is now closed and no more comments will be put through. See you next week!***
Saturday, May 17th, 2025 09:50 am
 

Artsy fartsy

 


 

So I finally caved and went to check out the foofooraw concerning this whole AI thing that has folks all riled up.  I went in with some preconceptions.  The first preconception is the idea of “machine intelligence” is probably significantly less than the advertising agencies masquerading as “Tech Titans” want you to believe.

So mostly I went in and asked specific questions:  Subjects like carrying capacity and oil use and fertilizer use.  The results really don’t seem to be all that different than using a decent search engine.  

First I need to discuss the “platform” that I used.  I used Grok, not because I did any serious research, but because its owner pisses off people who amuse me immensely with their histrionics.  I seriously doubt that other competitors in this will give any “better” answers to my basic queries.

Second, I am not going to publish the results here, if this kind of thing interests you, go and play around with it yourself.  All I am going to discuss is what I think of the results.  

Simply put, when I search a subject using the google search engine with add "udm=14" which strips off the AI from google search, I get a string of links which let me look at other folks websites which will purportedly answer my question.  This is what I am used to.  It has worked pretty well for the past twenty years.  I really have no complaints.  

I posed the same question to grok, and I got back a 2300 word essay with footnotes (links) summarizing what is out there.  The links are pretty damn close to what the udm=14 gave me and actually was more pleasant to work with.  For the question “Calculate Earth's carrying capacity for humans”, it actually offered several fairly exhaustive studies with a not-at-all terrible condensation of the data available.

Overall, what grok gave me was approximately equivalent to what I would expect from an average freshman at a small state college.  

OSZAR »